Peer Review Process

A rigorous and transparent peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of published research.

Peer Review Commitment

Journal applies a double-blind peer-review process to all submitted manuscripts.

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who assess its originality, scientific quality, methodological rigor, relevance, and overall contribution to the field.

The identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process.

The final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection rests with the Editor and is made based on the reviewers' evaluations, the quality of the manuscript, and the Journal's editorial standards.

Double-Blind Peer Review

The identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process to support an objective, fair, and unbiased assessment of submitted manuscripts.

Review Criteria

1. Originality
The manuscript should present original work and make a meaningful contribution beyond existing literature.
 
2. Scientific Quality
The research should demonstrate appropriate academic quality, sound reasoning, and sufficient evidence to support its findings.
 
3. Methodological Rigor
The research methodology should be appropriate, clearly explained, and sufficiently rigorous to support the research objectives.
 
4. Relevance
The manuscript should be relevant to the scope and academic focus of the Journal.
 
5. Contribution
The findings should provide a clear academic contribution to the relevant field of social sciences and humanities.
 
6. Presentation
The manuscript should be clearly structured, logically presented, and written in appropriate academic language.

Peer Review Process

1. Initial Screening
Submitted manuscripts are initially checked for compliance with the Journal's scope, basic requirements, and submission standards.
 
2. Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
 
3. Double-Blind Review
Reviewers independently evaluate the manuscript while the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential.
 
4. Editorial Decision
The Editor evaluates the reviewers' recommendations and determines whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.

Editorial Decision

The reviewers' recommendations serve as an important basis for the editorial decision. However, the final decision regarding the publication of a manuscript rests with the Editor.

The Editor may request revisions when necessary to improve the manuscript's academic quality, clarity, methodological rigor, or relevance before a final publication decision is made.

Commitment to Fair Review

Journal is committed to maintaining a fair, objective, confidential, and academically rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research.